REVIEWS. Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pages. Christopher Norris, Deconstruction: Theory and Practice. Criticism and Institutions: The American an Culler – – In Derek Attridge, Geoffrey Bennington & Robert Young (eds.), Post-Structuralism. Jonathan Culler, On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Pp. – Volume 13 Issue.
|Published (Last):||24 February 2015|
|PDF File Size:||17.62 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Without language, thought is a vague, uncharted nebula. Here is a statement by Culler the italics are mine: This, the most distinctive element in Derrida, is of course the element that has appealed to some of the experts about texts — literary critics.
In the temporal process of thinking about anything, one explanation collapses into its contrary. Cornell University Press joanthan, – Literary Criticism – pages. The principle of difference as enunciated by Saussure requires a stable system of oppositions: Big-D Deconstruction characteristically chooses the left-hand side of this list.
Language is partly an autonomous system and is partly a set of names that derive their meaning from outside the system. Newsletters Comment Print this page.
One ought therefore to distinguish between authentic deconstruction and capital-D Deconstruction, which in its monistic forms is a very inconsistent philosophy indeed. Culler Limited preview – This collapse into the other has its antecedents in other pre-Derridean philosophers, particularly Hegel. On Deconstruction is both an authoritative synthesis of Derrida’s thought and an analysis of the often-problematic relation Emma Williams – – Educational Philosophy and Jonathaj 46 He does not address the non-literary, cultural question as to why Derrida should have caught on in deconstructon American academic scene.
The Pursuit of Signs: No keywords specified fix it. He belongs to a school of modern philosophy that has representatives in both the Anglo-American and Continental camps and includes such diverse names as Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Quine and Sellars — all of whom, despite their diversity, are united in their criticism of the idea that knowledge can have a firm foundation in anything.
But the cultural question that needs to be asked is whether we want to sustain the institutions of textual analysis that have dominated academic literary criticism in the past forty years. The Antinomies of Thought. His magisterial way of tracing particular topics and techniques through our diaspora of critical texts, and his provocative analyses, cannot fail to focus any critic’s thinking about deconstruction.
Seven Pillars of a New Research Agenda. Post-Structuralism and the Question of History.
For one thing, it was empirically wrong of Saussure to claim that meaning in language arises exclusively from the systematic play of differences. Michael Traynor – – Ojnathan Inquiry 6 3: Chapter One Readers and Reading.
On Deconstruction is both an authoritative synthesis of Derrida’s thought and an analysis of the often-problematic relation between his philosophical writings and the work of literary critics. Reading as a Woman pp. Is it too much to hope that Deconstruction, the reductio ad absurdum of formalism and also a very inconsiderable philosophymay be the last gasp of this evasive tradition?
Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Unfortunately for the coherence of that philosophy, deferment and difference do not fit eeconstruction harmoniously. For a recent account of empirical work on names and the function of language in the development of concepts and vice versa, see Language Acquisition. An academic institution, like any other, adopts an ideology that preserves the institution as it is.
The Textuality of Thought.
Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism – PhilPapers
Psychologically, our thought, apart from its expression in words — is only a shapeless and indistinct mass. But one can argue that in fact the transformation or modification of meaning that characterises misunderstanding is also at work in what we call understanding At the second level, a powerful theory with literary jonahan seeks to analyse those structures which it takes to be most fundamental or characteristic, and thus emphasises repetition Affective Comprehension of Literary Narratives.
The principle of deferment, however, is a principle of constant cu,ler for the system as a whole. This baffled even Derrida, as he told me some years back. Sign in Create an account. Literary Deconstruction is another version of formalism. Product Detail Trade paperback US. Formalism has seduced American literary study away from these authentic and original cultural purposes.
Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature.